Feedback: I am a failure, who is disappointed with his life

karlsmith00 wrote:

"your channel is hilarious. another example of an ugly guy who's dissapointed[sic] with his life, and then he becomes a "men's rights" activist to avoid any personal responsibility for being a failure.

you're a loser, and it's your fault. men have more rights, more than they should. but thanks for the channel, it's always good for a laugh."

This is a very good summary of people with victim based mentalities. They can respond to their personal inadequacies by attaching to a physical characteristic of their own being, by attaching to being black or a woman or a homosexual, etc. Elevating the status of the group that they belong in by accident of their birth they elevate their own status by default.

However, hateful individuals like karlsmith00, who have merely stumbled onto part of the truth, lack the ability to discriminate vise a vise the efficacy of a cause. A victim is a victim where their cause is just. If I can point out where a MRA has less rights in law and suffers genuine oppression in terms of reproductive rights then that is viable case, but it does not make him a victim in all avenues of life. When feminists turn over every rock to find grievances and to create victimisations out of whole cloth then that points to the moribund victim manufacturing nature of what the movement has become.

He also has a problem in understanding reality or seeking the truth. Evidence that I am a failure? Apparently this hugely ugly (in mind, not body) individual knows how satisfied I am with my own life. Never mind the fact that physical appearance is not important to men.

The fact of the matter is that I haven't made a video in a while because I am so busy with my personal pursuits. Programming websites, programming games, reading, writing, photography, planning a huge journey overseas, and much more. The whole meaning of an activist/victim is that they have little to their life outside the pet cause of political activism.

Posted on: Friday, July 17, 2009 12:08 AM
Share this post: email it, bookmark It, digg It, kick It

Comments

  1. Posted by: JD on 7/17/2009 4:06 AM
    Gravatar
    Petty personal insults and an unfounded and negative assessment on you life. The closing is what gets me, though. Parting by making an argument and not even having the decency to support it; arguing without arguing.

    karlsmith00 is obviously unable to properly debate you on objective terrain so he tries to bring you down to where he feels comfortable: on the field of childish name-calling and non-sequitur statements.
  2. Posted by: Porky on 7/17/2009 9:19 AM
    Gravatar
    Wow, we have MORE rights than we should - what a cowpat of a man he is.
  3. Posted by: AlekNovy on 7/20/2009 5:49 PM
    Gravatar
    I love KarlSmith, she never ceases to stop making me laugh.

    I do think its a woman btw, regardless of the name.

    Now, you make an AWESOME point there, which is that the way to tell what someone's insecurities are, is to look at how he/she tries to insult others.

    If someone tries to "hurt" others by calling them ugly, then we know this person fears being "ugly" himself. Because in order to try to insult someone, you have to project from your own insecurities.



    A really funny case recently, was one involving MarinaIsTehSex (a really cool anti-feminist), and a feminist girl.


    After the feminist didn't like Marina's points, she proceeded to start bashing her by telling her "the only reason you support men's rights is because you can't get laid, and you think men will like you more if you support them", "you are an ugly chick who no man wants, and you can't get laid", "you've probably never had a boyfriend, that's why you hate feminists", etc... etc.

    Its funny seeing these catfights, where feminists who are supposedly against sexual objectification, talking about a woman's worth through the amount of sex she's had, lol.
  4. Posted by: ArgusEyes on 7/21/2009 4:35 AM
    Gravatar
    I think he/she is a woman too.
  5. Posted by: Mith on 7/21/2009 9:54 AM
    Gravatar
    -"your channel is hilarious.-

    Because a channel about oppression...be it reality or delusion, is just funny, am I right? That's why I spend countless hours going to feminist sites and laughing at all the things that they have issues with. Like women in middle easter countries getting stoned for being raped. Ha! I laughed so hard I had to buy myself a new keyboard. Women not able to vote? Giggles galor. Women being beaten by their abusive husbands and using their children to keep them hostage? Fun for the whole family!

    -another example of an ugly guy who's dissapointed[sic] with his life,-

    Wait, how is Argus ugly? There is nothing inheriently disgusting about Argus. He bathes, wears decent clothes, and has no physical deformity of any sort that would indicate a ugly apparence. At most he's on the hea-Ooooh, you mean because he's fat.

    Wow, the supposed "superiority" of women, am I right? Insulting people for their looks.

    Hey everyone, x person is a loser becasue he's overweight! He must be a failure!

    -and then he becomes a "men's rights" activist to avoid any personal responsibility for being a failure.-

    Yeah, just like how Marthen Luther King became a black rights activists because he didn't have a job. And that's why he's so well remembered in history; because he showed losers how to not look pathetic.

    Inspiring, isn't it?

    -you're a loser, and it's your fault.-

    Because I say so. So there. Feel bad about yourself. No really, this is a really crushing insult. Feel bad about your pathetic life while I don't start my sentences with capital letters. Why? Because capital letters is how men oppress women.

    No really, feeling bad yet? Please feel bad. It's the only way I can get off.

    -men have more rights, more than they should.-

    Seriously, when men are still allowed to breath, the world just went to hell in a basket.

    -but thanks for the channel, it's always good for a laugh.-

    Okay, fun and games are over with.

    The fact is ma'am, you are rather pathetic.

    In your entire attack, did you once challenge Argus's ideals? No. You've basically just insulted him. Congrats, you've copied the methods of a seven year old. Might I suggest that next time, you ask at least a fourteen year old on better insults?

    I have little idea why people find serious subjects so laughable. What, did you actually laugh at the article where a man bleeds the pains of his heart and soul of how he's been mistreated by women? Do you find it funny that children are being forced to pay child support because they were raped? Or was it the idea that men should have a right to see their kids?

    If this is so and I am after all, taking your word for it, you've not only insulted every man on this woman, every woman, but the very concept of humanity. You've taken the pain of people who are truly suffering and basically tossed them aside, calling it a joke and then saying that in essence, they deserve more pain. This in every aspect, shows the darkest part of humanity.

    You think it is alright to reduce other humans to mere laughable objects that don't matter and what's more, you claim to do so to 49% of the population. Why? And before you start on the "Argus is just a loser", you were the one whose stated that the things on Argus's channel is funny. In short, you find the misery of others amusing. You enjoy watching them suffer and even then, you think they have it too good.

    And of course, even after telling us how sick you are, you seem to try to demean Argus's argument by...demeaning him. And that paints a pretty dark picture of yourself. You not only enjoy the misery of others, but you enjoy inflicting it. Your low-life insults are directed at what you percieve to be insecurities on Argus's part. And what has he done? Said something general that you didn't like? He after all, didn't insult you or treat you in a similar manner, so why try so hard to demean him?

    The answer is of course, obvious. But of course, me being me, I won't just go out and say it. You see, I tend to get in debates at some dark, dark places of the internet and there is one fellow. Now, this fellow has a habit of attempting to batter people around with unnessicary large words and challenging people on scientific sources when he knows they're right. The reason for this is because in most cases, he lacks anything to back his argument. By using large words, he makes people who use more common words feel stupid at having to look them up or make them try to guess his exact intentions. By challenging people on scientific areas when he knows they're right, he tries to prod the person into conceding because they don't understand how it works, they just know that it does.

    Does this make him smart? No. It makes him a bully. He goes out of his way to make people feel worse about themselves to get what he wants. In some cases its for the purpose of winning the debate and perhaps in others just to make himself feel good.

    But in either case, he isn't proving that he's smart. And in a debate where someone knows his tricks, he often times comes off looking like a complete and utter ass...because he tried to trick the other person into thinking they're wrong and when it falls apart, everyone sees it.

    You are of a similar breed. You have no argument, so you naturally just try and make Argus look bad by attacking is physical appearence and claiming he's a loser. Why is Argus ugly? Oh he's fat. Well, he isn't really all that fat, he just looks a bit on the heavy side. Why is he a loser? Oh, because he...works on computers? Last I checked, computer experts are valued in a society that relies so heavily upon them.

    To anyone stupid enough to fall for your deceptions (which would be a young child), you would seem to be the one holding the cards. To anyone with any form of maturity, you look like an idiot. Because you've addressed none of his complaints, you haven't disproven anything, and you've just made yourself look bad.

    So tell me, why should anyone care about the opinion of an unobservant, shallow, and unintelligent individual?
  6. Posted by: ArgusEyes on 7/22/2009 12:17 AM
    Gravatar
    Good stuff Mith - Why not send him/her an email to his/her YouTube channel?
  7. Posted by: Porky on 7/22/2009 9:30 AM
    Gravatar
    Definitely a woman - i got into a protracted argument with her, started calling her "honey", she didnt skip a beat as most men would,and quickly started saying things like "you males". Ad hominems are of course a type of intellectual dishonesty so it doesn't surprise me she lies about her sex. For a moment there i thought she might actually become rational but alas...
  8. Posted by: ArgusEyes on 7/22/2009 9:12 PM
    Gravatar
    @Porky:
    With her introduction to me, there is no change of her being rational.
  9. Posted by: anon on 7/29/2009 2:24 AM
    Gravatar
    "men have more rights, more than they should."

    no doubt this feminist woman believes the optimum level of rights for men is none.
  10. Posted by: Mith on 8/3/2009 5:31 AM
    Gravatar
    Hmmmm, I just might, but I would like to bring this to your attention: http://www.vhemt.org/

    Am I the only one disturbed by this?
  11. Posted by: ArgusEyes on 8/3/2009 3:39 PM
    Gravatar
    The extinction of the human race just might be something I can get behind.
  12. Posted by: Mith on 8/4/2009 4:55 AM
    Gravatar
    I presume you're being a bit snarky?
  13. Posted by: ArgusEyes on 8/5/2009 11:22 PM
    Gravatar
    Yes. I do not support the eradication of the human race.
  14. Posted by: Josie Green on 8/16/2009 2:37 PM
    Gravatar
    Pathetic. What has Argus' appearance got to do with ANYTHING! However I am a little disturbed at this

    "That's why I spend countless hours going to feminist sites and laughing at all the things that they have issues with. Like women in middle easter countries getting stoned for being raped. Ha! I laughed so hard I had to buy myself a new keyboard. Women not able to vote? Giggles galor. Women being beaten by their abusive husbands and using their children to keep them hostage?"

    If that's just her making stuff up then shes even more of an idiot than she appeared. However if you really do go on pro-women websites and post abusive comments about women who have suffered rape or abuse, then you're sick, plain and simple.

    I'm assuming she is wrong, right?
  15. Posted by: Martin on 8/27/2009 5:17 AM
    Gravatar
    Sure is a feminist womin the ad hominem attack is their modus operandi...
    I know them very well! Boring...

    «men have more rights, more than they should»
    Feminist politic program: Men must have no right at all.

  16. Posted by: malay on 3/27/2010 3:25 AM
    Gravatar
    i am failure who is now in mercy attemt of his engineering life
  17. Posted by: toutou on 8/29/2010 6:38 PM
    Gravatar
    ewrsdgty louis vuitton sale
    I have developed a multilevel definition that works for me and was willing to share it and defend it. In the process, I believe I have clarified and strengthened my definition even if it may require further clarification and perhaps some revision
    louis vuitton handbags
    louis vuitton bags
    louis vuitton
    UK louis vuitton
    Damier Graphite
    Miu Miu handbags
    Jimmy Choo handbags
    Gucci Handbags
    Bottega Veneta handbags
    I comment on blogs and write one of my own. I look at life as a process that consists primarily of teaching and learning. One should never stop doing either.
    Hermes handbags
    Mulberry handbags
    tiffany jewelry
    tiffany co

Post your comment




(this will save your form settings for the next time you comment)
Please add 4 and 3 and type the answer here:

The umbrella in particular is remembered as the symbol of the nineteenth century’s disturbing obsession with individualism. In Bellamy’s utopia, umbrellas have been replaced with retractable canopies so that everyone is protected from the rain equally.
“In the nineteenth century,” explains a character, “when it rained, the people of Boston put up three hundred thousand umbrellas over as many heads, and in the twentieth century they put up one umbrella over all the heads.”